Plate.
AI-native headless CMS with focus on content reuse and structuring
Plate is a Dutch innovation in the CMS landscape: a headless content management system that uses AI to structure and reuse content more intelligently. Modern, affordable, and built for 2024.
What is Plate?
Plate belongs to the headless CMSs – platforms that separate content management from presentation. Instead of "pages and templates" you think in structured content and API endpoints. This gives you freedom: the same content can go to web, app, AI chatbot, or print.
Plate specifically combines that headless model with AI-native workflows. It doesn't direct your editor to predefined content types, but lets them build the page first and structures the content afterwards via AI analysis.
What makes Plate different?
Plate takes a unique approach: while traditional headless CMSs say "define your content model first," Plate says "create your content first, we'll structure it." The system analyzes content in real-time and automatically suggests reuse – if you mention the same company again, it warns you. This feels more natural for editors.
Moreover, Plate integrates AI deeply into the editor. With "Structured Assistant" you can analyze content with a click and automatically structure it. Another innovation: Plate partners can manage 2000+ content instances (see Topicus in primary education) without the platform straining.
Finally, it's a Dutch product, which means easier support and European hosting/compliance by default.
Strengths
AI-driven content reuse – Automatic detection of content duplication and suggestions for linking; saves manual maintenance.
Flexible editor experience – Build now, structure later; no cumbersome pre-defined schemas that block editors.
Multi-tenant scale – Topicus runs 2000+ instances via white-label without performance issues; proves Plate is solid.
European compliance native – GDPR-compliant out of the box, AWS hosting in EU, Dutch support.
Who uses Plate?
Plate counts 2000+ customers and partners globally, with strong presence in the Netherlands and Benelux.
Topicus – 6000+ clients in education use Plate as white-label CMS
NUOVO Scholengroep – Content management for 40+ schools
Leergeld Nederland – Content management for Dutch non-profit
Lelie zorggroep – Dutch healthcare organization with multisite content
9altitudes – Digital agency, uses Plate for clients
Bunzl – European distributor, internal and external content
The mix is interesting: many Dutch midsize companies, agencies, and non-profits, fewer multinational Fortune 500 clients. This fits Plate's positioning.
Our perspective
We see Plate as an interesting local alternative that does many things well where Contentful or Sanity feel more complicated. The AI-driven content reuse is genuinely handy. The editor is faster than we're used to. Pricing is much more beginner-friendly.
Where to be cautious: Plate has less enterprise-hardening than established players. ISO certifications are in prep, not available from day one. Ecosystem (integrations, partners) is smaller. But for growing mid-size companies and Dutch organizations? Plate is serious.
Suitable for
Mid-size companies (50-500 people) that want to manage content quickly
Dutch/European organizations with GDPR focus
Teams that prefer content-first over schema-first working
Agencies that want to offer white-label CMSs
Consider carefully
Enterprise features still growing – Some compliance requirements and audit trails are still in development
Ecosystem is small – Fewer third-party apps than Contentful; custom development is more often needed
Newer product – Founded 2014, but Delta (headless) is younger; older products have more maturity
Support timezone – EU-based, perfect for Europe, less advantageous if you need support in Asia/US
Is Plate suitable for enterprise?
Yes, but cautiously yes. Plate can handle scale (proof: Topicus). Compliance is good (GDPR native). Support is personal. However: many enterprise companies expect ISO 27001 and SOC 2 day-one; Plate is working on these but doesn't have them yet. Custom SLAs and dedicated infrastructure are also not standard. If you need absolute enterprise-hardening, look at Contentful or Sanity first.
Summary: Plate is what you get when you build a CMS from the perspective of modern editors and Dutch practicality, not legacy enterprise requirements. It works well, it's affordable, and it feels relatively fresh. For beginning to midsize companies it's a great choice. For million-euro budgets or absolute-no-compromise compliance, you're better off looking at Sitecore or Contentful.
Need help with your CMS choice? We're happy to help with your evaluation and selection process.
Schedule a callIn practice
Integrations & ecosystem
Plate offers a Connectivity Hub with capabilities for API, Webhooks, GraphQL, and Zapier integrations. Out-of-the-box there are connections with Salesforce, AFAS (Dutch HR/ERP), Strapi (CMS), and various other tools. It's not as large as Zapier's 6000+ integrations, but sufficient for typical stacks. OpenAPI specs are available, so you can generate clients in any language. It feels developer-friendly without the Java boilerplate of AEM.
Implementation
Faster than AEM. A typical Plate setup: 6-12 weeks from kickoff to live. Costs: EUR 30,000-100,000 depending on integrations. Hosting is fully managed on AWS; you don't need an infrastructure team. That saves a lot. Plate offers partners (40+ listed) who do implementation. This ranges from agencies to technical consultants. Quality varies; do your due diligence.
Support & community
Plate offers email/chat support with normal response times. Given the company's size, this is more personal than at Contentful or Adobe. There's a growing community (Slack, forums), but it's not large. Much knowledge sharing happens via documentation. For edge-case problems: you're sometimes faster with direct contact to team Plate than with ticket escalation at larger vendors.
AI & product development
Plate's Structured Assistant (AI-driven content parsing) is production-ready. It really works: you can dump a blob of text and the system gives you suggestions for fields and structure. It's not perfect, but saves hands-on work. Vector database (what you'd expect for an AI-native CMS) is not explicitly mentioned in their documentation. That's potentially a growth area; expect Plate to make more investments here in 2025/2026.
Compare with alternatives
How does Plate compare to Contentful?
Contentful is bigger, more enterprise-ready, global. Plate is cheaper, faster to go live, better for Europe-first teams. Contentful wins on ecosystem size and marketing. Plate wins on UX simplicity and support. Both are headless; technically not as far apart as AEM vs Contentful.
Also check out our analyses of other headless CMS solutions:
Sanity – Strong developer community, flexible data model, better for content modelers
Contentful – Enterprise standard, large ecosystem, more expensive
Storyblok – Headless CMS with visual editor, good balance price/features
Contentstack – Enterprise DXP with multi-cloud hosting
Frequently asked questions
Do I need a developer to get Plate live?
How much does Plate cost?
Does Plate work well with React/Vue/Next.js?
Is Plate GDPR-compliant?
Can I offer Plate as white-label?
What if I need to migrate from Plate?
Need help with your CMS choice?
Breakfast helps you make the right choice. Independent advice, no hidden agendas.
Schedule a call